Politics and public administration relationship goals

politics and public administration relationship goals

Public Administration is concerned with the way government operates. And International Studies focuses on international relations and. Understanding the relationship between politics and administration is critical for the architects of modern public administration asserted to prescribe how .. 28, No. 1 emerge, the top executive is expected to harmonize political goals with. Politics and public administration are very closely linked. Lets understand the relationship between political science and public administration. controls and hence, it makes sense for the public administrators to be in sync with societal goals.

The principal concern of early civil service reformers was not greater administrative efficiency but was cleansing and promoting democracy. The primary issue was not increasing efficiency but was protecting and building moral.

There is no argument regarding the fact that public administration emerged as a discipline of political science, the former deals with the output of the Government machinery and the latter with the input.

It can also be put as such that, political science provides the framework within which public administration functions. From the academic perspective, both these subjects share a number of common areas of study like constitutional law, administrative law, delegated legislation, government budgeting and local governments amongst many other. So, a comprehensive understanding of both the subjects is mutually inclusive to each other, to learn one, the other has to be mastered as well.

Another important academic field from which public administration heavily borrows and is deeply influenced is the Sociology. It is a branch of study which deals with social order, change, class, conflict, problems, associations and institutions.


According to Marshal Edward Dimock, administration takes place in a social setting and it is the society which determines the pattern of administration.

He goes ahead and adds that through an administrative leadership however, the society itself can be changed for good. He says that the job of a public administrator is not mere administration but that of a social engineer who can bring about desirable changes in the society. By the s, scholars of public administration had responded to Wilson's solicitation and thus textbooks in this field were introduced. Frederick Taylor —another prominent scholar in the field of administration and management also published a book entitled The Principles of Scientific Management He believed that scientific analysis would lead to the discovery of the "one best way" to do things or carrying out an operation.

This, according to him could help save cost and time.

Politics and Public Administration

Taylor's technique was later introduced to private industrialists, and later into the various government organizations Jeong, Taylor's scientific management consisted of main four principles Frederick W.

Replace rule-of-thumb work methods with methods based on a scientific study of the tasks. Scientifically select, train, and develop each employee rather than passively leaving them to train themselves. Provide "detailed instruction and supervision of each worker in the performance of that worker's discrete task" Montgomery Divide work nearly equally between managers and workers, so that the managers apply scientific management principles to planning the work and the workers actually perform the tasks.

Taylor had very precise ideas about how to introduce his system approach: And the duty of enforcing the adoption of standards and enforcing this cooperation rests with management alone.

Political Science and Public Administration

The separation of politics and administration advocated by Wilson continues to play a significant role in public administration today. However, the dominance of this dichotomy was challenged by second generation scholars, beginning in the s. Luther Gulick 's fact-value dichotomy was a key contender for Wilson's proposed politics-administration dichotomy.

In place of Wilson's first generation split, Gulick advocated a "seamless web of discretion and interaction". Gulick, Urwick, and the new generation of administrators built on the work of contemporary behavioural, administrative, and organizational scholars including Henri FayolFredrick Winslow TaylorPaul Appleby, Frank Goodnow, and Willam Willoughby.

Public administration

The new generation of organizational theories no longer relied upon logical assumptions and generalizations about human nature like classical and enlightened theorists. Gulick developed a comprehensive, generic theory of organization that emphasized the scientific method, efficiency, professionalism, structural reform, and executive control.

Gulick summarized the duties of administrators with an acronym; POSDCORBwhich stands for planning, organizing, staffing, directing, coordinating, reporting, and budgeting.

Fayol developed a systematic, point treatment of private management. Second-generation theorists drew upon private management practices for administrative sciences.

politics and public administration relationship goals

A single, generic management theory bleeding the borders between the private and the public sector was thought to be possible. With the general theory, the administrative theory could be focused on governmental organizations.

The mids theorists challenged Wilson and Gulick. The politics-administration dichotomy remained the centre of criticism. Public Administration experienced a kind of heyday due to the successful war effort and successful post war reconstruction in Western Europe and Japan.

Government was popular as was President Eisenhower. In the s and s, government itself came under fire as ineffective, inefficient, and largely a wasted effort.

Public administration - Wikipedia

The costly American intervention in Vietnam along with domestic scandals including the bugging of Democratic party headquarters the Watergate scandal are two examples of self-destructive government behaviour that alienated citizens.

The costly Vietnam War alienated U.

politics and public administration relationship goals

Public administration would have to distance itself from politics to answer this call and remain effective. Elected officials supported these reforms. The Hoover Commissionchaired by University of Chicago professor Louis Brownlowto examine reorganization of government. Brownlow subsequently founded the Public Administration Service PAS at the university, an organization which has provided consulting services to all levels of government until the s.

Later on, the human factor became a predominant concern and emphasis in the study of public administration. This period witnessed the development and inclusion of other social sciences knowledge, predominantly, psychology, anthropology, and sociology, into the study of public administration Jeong, Appleby Policy and AdministrationFrank Marini 'Towards a New Public Administration'and others that have contributed positively in these endeavors.

In the s, new public management became prevalent throughout the bureaucracies of the US, the UK and, to a lesser extent, in Canada. The original public management theories have roots attributed to policy analysis, according to Richard Elmore in his article published in the " Journal of Policy Analysis and Management ". In New Public Management, people are viewed as economic units not democratic participants which is the hazard of linking an MBA business administration, economic and employer-based model too closely with the public administration governmental, public good sector.

Nevertheless, the NPM model one of four described by Elmore inincluding the "generic model" is still widely accepted at multiple levels of government e. In the late s, Janet and Robert Denhardt proposed a new public services model in response to the dominance of NPM. One example of this is openforum. Another new public service model is what has been called New Public Governance, an approach which includes a centralization of power; an increased number, role and influence of partisan-political staff; personal-politicization of appointments to the senior public service; and, the assumption that the public service is promiscuously partisan for the government of the day.

Thus, the same public policy and public administration was to apply to all citizens, inclusive of disability. However, by the s, categorical state systems were strengthened in the United States Racino, in press,and efforts were made to introduce more disability content into the public policy curricula [42] with disability public policy and administration distinct fields in their own right.